• It decided that this was “working time” for the purposes of the Directive. This case related to a security system installation and maintenance company whose technicians covered regions, going from customer to customer to carry out their work. The technicians were assigned to the central office in Madrid after the regional offices were draft. Each technician used a company vehicle to travel from their homes to the places where they were to work (sometimes over 100km away) and they drove home at the end of the day.

    The time spent travelling to customers at the start and end of the day had not been considered to be working time but as indicated above, the European Court decided that this was not right and this time should be taken into account.

    This case means that if a worker does not have a fixed place of work and travels to different locations to carry out their work, that worker is likely to be regarded as working on those journeys. The fact that those journeys might start and finish at the worker’s home is irrelevant and in this case, travel time was deemed to be working time as a result of their employer’s choice to close their regional offices.

    Keep up to date with the latest legal developments by following our Employment team on Twitter @brachers_emplaw.

    This content is correct at time of publication

    Can we help?

    Take a look at our Employment & HR page for useful information, resources, guidance, details of our team and how we may be able to help you

  • Get in touch

    Please fill out the below form or alternatively you can call us on 01622 690691

      By submitting an enquiry through 'get in touch' your data will only be used to contact you regarding your enquiry. Please view our privacy statement for more information