InsightsInsight - Employment & HR - POSTED: October 30 2015
Provision, criterion or practice must be established in indirect discrimination claims
Employment Tribunals cannot fill the gap in the burden of proof to establish that there was a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) in discrimination cases
- Share this article
- Print this article
The Employment Appeal Tribunal in the recent case of Bethnal Green and Shoreditch Education Trust v Dippenaar held that there was not sufficient evidence to prove indirect age discrimination when a teacher was dismissed due to the expense of her seniority.
The EAT held that there was no practice of dismissing employees on high salaries, which was what the teacher claimed, because this practice had not been repeated and it was not anticipated that it would be repeated.
The EAT held that the PCP must be established before the burden of proof could shift.
This content is correct at time of publication
Can we help?
Take a look at our Employment & HR page for useful information, resources, guidance, details of our team and how we may be able to help you
Get in touch
Please fill out the below form or alternatively you can call us on 01622 690691