• As a result, she reduced a substantial proportion of the Defence costs. The trial commenced on 12.03.18 and on day 3, the Claimant discontinued his action on the basis of new evidence that had emerged from one of the Defendant’s witnesses during cross-examination which substantially altered the Claimant’s prospects.

    The claimant alleged that if the clinician had included this “new” evidence in his original witness statement the case would never have reached trial.

    This highlights the importance for legal advisors to ensure statements cover all salient facts and are reviewed periodically following each step in the disclosure process and in consequence the normal order for costs did not apply.

    This content is correct at time of publication

    Can we help?

    Take a look at our Healthcare page for useful information, resources, guidance, details of our team and how we may be able to help you

  • Get in touch

    Please fill out the below form or alternatively you can call us on 01622 690691

      By submitting an enquiry through 'get in touch' your data will only be used to contact you regarding your enquiry. Please view our privacy statement for more information